Везде
Establishment of the content and application of foreign law in the legislation of foreign states
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Establishment of the content and application of foreign law in the legislation of foreign states
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000493-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexandra S. Kasatkina  Irina V. Getman-Pavlova
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
76-86
Abstract
The article is devoted to a complex study of one of the most complex institutions of private International Law (PIL) - establishing the content of foreign legal norms. Normative basis of the study is the legislation of PIL of a number of foreign states, judicial practice of France, Great Britain, Sweden, USA and other countries. The research methodology is based on the application of methods of comparative analysis and comparative law. In its legal nature, the institution for establishing the content of foreign law is procedural and is implemented in the international civil process. As a rule, the proper establishment of content is not an easy task for a national law enforcement official. In addition, foreign law should be applied as it is interpreted and applied in its «native» court. This requirement causes the greatest difficulties in the process of its practical implementation. From the point of view of the involvement of the court in the process of establishing the content of foreign law and the relation to this right, three approaches can be distinguished: 1) active (legal); 2) intermediate (mixed); 3) passive (actual). The article concludes that the most correct and functional is the active (legal) approach.
Keywords
private International Law, establishment of the content of foreign law, application of foreign law, conflict rules, active (legal) approach, intermodal approach, passive (actual) approach, continental law, common law, proof of foreign law
Date of publication
01.05.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1516
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Vol'f M. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. M., 1948. S. 32, 33 
 
 2. Shaheeza Lalani. Establishing the Content ofForeign Law: A Comparative Study//Maastricht Journal. 20: 1 (2013). R. 75-112 
 
 3. Trevor C. Hartley. Pleading and Proof of Foreign Law: The Major European Systems Compared//The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 45. No. 2 (Apr., 1996). R. 271-292. 
 
 4. Geeroms S. Foreign Law in Civil Litigation. A Somparative and Functional Analysis. Oxford, 2004. P. 23. V chastnosti, avtor otmechaet, chto printsip curia novit legem nikogda ne byl chast'yu anglijskogo prava. 
 
 5. Kreindler R.H. Transnational Litigation: A Basic Primer. Oxford, 1998. R. 50. 
 
 6. Tolstykh V.L. Normy inostrannogo prava v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave Rossijskoj Federatsii: dis.. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2006. S. 272. 
 
 7. Avstriya, Pol'sha, FRG, Shvejtsariya 
 
 8. Analogichnye polozheniya sm.: st. 3 Zakona o MChP Avstrii 1978 g. (v red.2014 g.), st. 14 GK Meksiki 1928 g. (v red. 1987 g.). 
 
 9. Shaheeza Lalani. Establishing the Content of Foreign Law: A Comparative Study//Maastricht Journal. 20:1 (2013). R. 75-112. 
 
 10. Christian von Bar. Internationales Privatrecht. Vol. I: Allge-meine Lehren.1987, note 372. 
 
 11. Geeroms S. Foreign Law in Civil Litigation. A Somparative and Functional Analysis. Oxford, 2004. P. 97, 98. 
 
 12. Shaheeza Lalani. Op. cit. R. 75-112. 
 
 13. Trevor C. Hartley. Op. cit. R. 271-292. 
 
 14. Ruth Ginsburg. Proof of Foreign Law in Sweden//The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 14. No. 1 (Jan., 1965). R. 277-281 
 
 15. Shaheeza Lalani. Op. cit. R. 75-112. 
 
 16. Podrobnee o Frantsii sm.: Tolstykh V.L. Ukaz. soch. 
 
 17. Trevor C. Hartley. Op. cit. R. 271-292. 
 
 18. Mayer P., Heuze V. Droit international priv6. Montchrestien, 9 6d., 2007. P. 128. 
 
 19. Shaheeza Lalani. Op. cit. R. 75-112. 
 
 20. Trevor C. Hartley. Op. cit. R. 271-292. 
 
 21. Trevor C. Hartley. Op. cit. R. 271-292. 
 
 22. Cheshir Dzh., Nort P. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. M., 1982. S. 150. 
 
 23. Dannyj Akt primenyaetsya chrezvychajno redko (sm.: Shaheeza Lalani. Op. cit. R. 75-112). 
 
 24. Biryukova N.S. Pravovaya kvalifikatsiya v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007. S. 35, 36. 
 
 25. Shaheeza Lalani. Op. cit. R. 75-112 
 
 26. Trevor C. Hartley. Op. cit. R. 271-292

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate