Везде
The interpretation of law by the supreme court of the Russian Federation in the context of the modern legal system (the end)
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The interpretation of law by the supreme court of the Russian Federation in the context of the modern legal system (the end)
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000493-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Viktor Momotov 
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
30-36
Abstract
The article considers the place and role of interpretations of the legal norms given by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the legal system of Russia. Based on the views of representatives of the sociological school of law, the position is based on which such interpretations are sources of law (the so-called "living law"). The general assessment of the system of interpretation of law in force in the Russian Federation is given, under which the Supreme Court exercises an official interpretation of law. On concrete examples it is shown that the highest judicial instance applies all the methods of interpretation developed by the science of the theory of law: literal, systemic, teleological, historical. The hierarchy of interpretations of legal norms by the Supreme Court (definitions on specific cases, reviews of judicial practice, decisions of the Plenum) is formulated, each of which "steps" is a prerequisite for the subsequent. The significance of the interpretation of the highest judicial instance for the development of the legal system is shown, in particular, in filling legal gaps, in resolving legal conflicts, in applying existing legal regulation to dynamically changing and complicated public relations, and in the mutual influence of interpretation of law and lawmaking...
Keywords
interpretation of law, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the resolution of the Plenum, judicial practice, sources of law
Date of publication
01.05.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1460
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2018. № 4 
 
 2. Petrov V.A., Tikhonravov E.Yu. Probely i kollizii v prave. M., 2017. S. 68 
 
 3. Byulleten' VS RF. 2016. № 5 
 
 4. Zagajnova S.K. Sudebnye akty v mekhanizme realizatsii sudebnoj vlasti v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse. M., 2007. S. 89. 
 
 5. Sm.: SZ RF. 1996. № 3, st. 140. 
 
 6. Sm.: Byulleten' VS RF. 2012. № 9. 
 
 7. Sm.: tam zhe. 2015. № 3. 
 
 8. Sm.: Lundmark T. Charting the Divide between Common and Civil Law. Oxford, 2012. P. 361. 
 
 9. Sm.: Byulleten' VS RF 2015. № 8. 
 
 10. Sm.: tam zhe. 2016. № 5. 
 
 11. Sm.: tam zhe. 2015. № 12. 
 
 12. Sm.: tam zhe. 2015. № 3. 
 
 
 13. Sm.: Ross. gaz. 2017. 25 apr. 
 
 14. Sm.: Byulleten' VS RF. 2017. № 2. 
 
 15. Sm.: Sm.: tam zhe. 2015. № 12. 
 
 16. Sm.: SZ RF. 2011. № 48, st. 6724. 
 
 17. Sm.: SZ RF. 1997. № 47, st. 5340. 
 
 18. Sm.: SZ RF. 1996. № 1, st. 16. 
 
 19. Sm.: Ross. gaz. 2017. 24 maya 
 
 20. Byulleten' VS RF. 2012. № 4 
 
 21. Dokument opublikovan v SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus". 
 
 22. Dokument opublikovan v SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus". 
 
 23. Dokument opublikovan v SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». 
 
 24. Sm.: Byulleten' VS RF. 2013. № 8. 
 
 25. Dokument opublikovan v SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus". 
 
 26. Byulleten' VS RF. 2014. № 3

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate