1. Дьяченко Е.Б., Энтин К.В. Обзор практик Суда Евразийского экономического союза в 2017–2018 годах // Закон. 2019. № 3. С. 93, 94.
2. Колодкин Р.А. Фрагментация международного права // Московский журнал междунар. права. 2005. № 2. С. 44.
3. Чайка К.Л., Савенков А.Н. Проблемные вопросы в практике Суда Евразийского экономического союза // Государство и право. 2018. № 10. С. 6–10.
4. Энтин К., Дьяченко Е. Обзор практики Суда Евразийского экономического союза в 2018 году // Международное правосудие. 2019. № 1 (29). С. 4–8.
5. Broude T. Fragmentation(s) of International Law: On Normative Integration as Authority Allocation // in: Broude T., Shany Y. (eds). The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law. Hart, 2008. P. 99–122.
6. Burke-White W.W. International Legal Pluralism // Michigan Journal of International Law. 2004. № 25. P. 963, 971.
7. Cancado Trindade AA. International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium. 2nd edn. Leiden, 2013. P. 393.
8. De Wet E., Vidmar J. (eds). Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights. Oxford, 2012. P. 13–16.
9. Foucault M. Les mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. P., 1966.
10. Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising From the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission. URL: https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_l682.pdf (дата обращения: 09.12.2019).
11. Jaklic K. Constitutional Pluralism in EU. Oxford, 2014. P. 2 - 4.
12. Jakubowski A., Wierczyńska K. Fragmentation vs Constitutionalisation of International Law: A Practical Inquiry. London, 2016. P. 1–4. 52.
13. Kennedy D. One, Two, Three, Many Legal Orders: Legal Pluralism and the Cosmopolitan Dream // New York Review of Law and Social Change. 2007. № 31. P. 641, 658.
14. Krisch N. The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law // European Journal of International Law. 2007. № 17. P. 247, 267.
15. Kumm M. The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State // in: Dunoff J.L., Trachtman J.P. (eds). Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance. Cambridge, 2009. P. 9, 227, 258.
16. MacCormick N. Beyond the Sovereign State // Modern Law Review. 1993. № 1. P. 1 - 18.
17. Maduro M. Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action // in: Walker N. (ed.). Sovereignity in Transition. Oxford, 2003. P. 501–529.
18. Martineau AC. The Rhetoric of Fragmentation: Fear and Faith in International Law // Michigan Journal of International Law. 25 (2004). P. 849.
19. O'Donoghue A. Constitutionalism in Global Constitutionalization. Cambridge, 2014. P. 90, 91, 140–150.
20. Peters A. Constitutional Fragments: On the Interaction of Constitutionalization and Fragmentation in International Law // Working Paper (Centre for Global Constitutionalism, University of St Andrews). 2(2015).
21. Rittberger B., Schimmelfennig F. The constitutionalization of the European Union. New York, 2007. P. 2, 3.
22. Schwobel CEJ. Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective. Leiden, 2011. P. 14–21.
23. Tomuschat C. International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century // Receuil des Cours. 2018. № 281. P. 29–43.
24. Walker N. The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism // Modern Law Review. 2006. № 65. P. 317 - 359.
25. Weiler J. In Defence of the Status Quo: Europe’s Constitutional Sonderweg // in: Wind M. and Weiler J. (eds). Constitutionalism Beyond the State. Cambridge, 2003. P. 104–111, 117–122.
26. Weiler J. The Constitution of Europe: Do the New Clothes have an Emperor? and Other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge, 1999. P. 91, 92, 339.
27. Zeigler K.S. International law and EU law: between assymetric constitutionalisation and fragmentation // in: Orakhelashvili A. Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law. Cheltenham, 2011. P. 268.
Комментарии
Сообщения не найдены