Везде
INTELLECTUAL MOVEMENTS AS AN OBJECT OF SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
INTELLECTUAL MOVEMENTS AS AN OBJECT OF SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Konstantin Fursov 
Edition
Volume 306 Sotsialogicheski issledovania. Issue 10
Pages
90-99
Abstract
An attempt is made to find out the prospects of using the concept of intellectual movements in the sociology of knowledge. The study of materials on the sociology of science revealed an increasing interest in the sociological analysis of the activities and processes of institutionalization of poorly structured intellectual communities. The case of the Moscow methodological circle (MMC) is used as an example confirming the applicability of the concept under consideration for specific research.
Keywords
institutional structures, innovations in science, intellectual movements, sociology of science
Date of publication
05.10.2009
Number of purchasers
0
Views
451
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Gajdenko P. P. Nauchnaya ratsional'nost' i filosofskij razum. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2003. S. 528.
 2. Gudkov L. O polozhenii sotsial'nykh nauk v Rossii // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2006. N 77. (http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2006/77/gu23.html)
 3. Karadi V. Strategii povysheniya statusa sotsiologii shkoloj Ehmilya Dyurkgejma // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2004. T. VII. N 5. S. 12 - 49.
 4. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsij / Per. s angl. I. Eh. Naletova. M., 1975.
 5. Kun T. Ob'ektivnye, tsennostnye suzhdeniya i vybor teorii // Sovremennaya filosofiya nauki: Znanie, ratsional'nost', tsennosti v trudakh myslitelej Zapada. 2-e izd. M.: Logos, 1996. S. 61 - 82.
 6. Lakatos I. Istoriya nauki i ee ratsional'nye rekonstruktsii / Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsij: Per. s angl. i sost. V. Yu. Kuznetsov. - M.: OOO "Izdatel'stvo ACT", 2003. S. 495.
 7. Latur B. Dajte mne laboratoriyu, i ya perevernu mir // Logos. 2002. N 5 - 6 (35). S. 211 - 242. 
 8. Maracha V. G. Moskovskij metodologicheskij kruzhok: osnovnye programmnye idei i formy organizatsii intellektual'nykh praktik. 2003. (http:gp.metod.ru/mmk/problem/problemlssue/5)
 9. Merton R. Sotsial'naya teoriya i sotsial'naya struktura. M.: ACT; ACT Moskva; Khranitel', 2006.
 10. N'yuton-Smit V. Ratsional'nost' nauki // Sovremennaya filosofiya nauki: Znanie, ratsional'nost', tsennosti v trudakh myslitelej Zapada. 2-e izd. M.: Logos, 1996. S. 246 - 294.
 11. Patnem Kh. Razum, istina i istoriya. M., 2002.
 12. Popper K. Ob'ektivnoe znanie. Ehvolyutsionnyj podkhod. Per. s angl. D. G. Lakhuti. Otv. red. V. N. Sadovskij. M.: Ehditorial URSS, 2002. S. 84 - 88, 96 - 108.
 13. Porus V. N. Sistemnyj smysl ponyatiya "nauchnaya ratsional'nost'" / Ratsional'nost' kak predmet filosofskogo issledovaniya. Otv. red. B. I. Pruzhinin, V. S. Shvyrev. M.: Izdatel'stvo IF-RAN, 1995. S. 91.
 14. Fejerabend P. Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki. M.: Progress, 1986.
 15. Bernal J.P. Die Wissenschaft in der Geschichte. Berlin, 1967; sm. takzhe: Bernal Dzh. Nauka v istorii obschestva. M., 1956. S. 18.
 16. Bloor D. Knowledge and social imagery. A case study. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1991. P. 3 - 22.
 17. Burke P. Social history of knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
 18. David M. You know Bart Simpson is real / I know he's only an actor // Current Sociology, 2008. Vol. 56(4). P. 517 - 534. 
 19. Gross N.. Frickel S. A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements // American Sociological Review, 2005. Vol. 70. P. 204 - 232.
 20. Lamont M. How to become a dominant French philosopher: The case of Jacques Derrida // American Journal of Sociology, 1987. No. 95. P. 584 - 622.
 21. Latour B., Woolgar S. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage, 1979.
 22. McCarthy Doyle E. Knowledge as culture: the new sociology of knowledge. London; New York: Routledge, 1996.
 23. McLaughlin N. How to become a forgotten intellectual: Intellectual movements and the rise and fall of Erich Fromm // Sociological Fromm. 1998. Vol. 13, No. 2. P. 215 - 246.
 24. MeLaughlin N. Why do schools of thought fail? Neo-Freudianism as a case study in the sociology of knowledge // Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 1998. No. 34(2). P. 113 - 134.
 25. Mulkay M. Sociology of science: A sociological pilgrimage. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991. 
 26. Mullins N.C., Millins C.J. Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology. NY: Harper and Row, 1973.
 27. Parsons T. Sociological theory and modern society. New York: Free Press, 1967.
 28. Power A. A question of knowledge. London: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
 29. Shils E. The constitution of society. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1982. P. 182.
 30. Umpleby S. The Design of Intellectual Movements / Proceedings of the annual meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences. Shanghai, August 2 - 6, 2002. (http://www.gwu.edu/~umpleby/recent_papers/2002_design_of_intellectu al_movements.htm)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate