Везде
МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ НАУЧНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ НА ИСТФАКЕ МГУ МОЖЕТ ЛИ ИСТОРИЯ БЫТЬ ОБЪЕКТИВНОЙ?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ НАУЧНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ НА ИСТФАКЕ МГУ МОЖЕТ ЛИ ИСТОРИЯ БЫТЬ ОБЪЕКТИВНОЙ?
Annotation
PII
S013038640000616-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
3-40
Abstract
In conference materials the important points of reports of the conference participants are presented. The particular interest is caused by the argumentation of the different, at times opposite, points of view, and also the discussion about actual problems of a historical science and history teaching at the higher school.
Keywords
TASKS OF A HISTORICAL SCIENCE, OBJECTIVITY OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE, SCIENTIFI C METHODOLOGY OF STUDYING OF THE PAST, A CURRENT STATE OF THE SOURCE BASES
Date of publication
01.05.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1334
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Carr E. What is History? New York, 1961.
    2. 

  2. Jenkins K. Rethinking History. New York -London, 1991; idem. On 'What is History'. New York -London 1995; idem. Why History? New York -London, 1999; idem. Refi guring History. New York, 2003; idem. The Limits of History. New York -London, 2009.
    3. 

  3. Munslow A. Deconstructing History. London, 1997; idem. The New Nature of History: Knowledge, Evidence, Language. London, 2001; idem. The New History. London, 2003; idem. Narrative and History. London, 2007.
    4. 

  4. Novick P. That Noble Dream: The "Objectivity Question" and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge, 1988.
    5. 

  5. Appleby J., Hunt L., Jacob M. Telling the Truth About History. New York -London, 1994.
    6. 

  6. Materialy diskussii "Aktual'nye teoreticheskie problemy istoricheskoj nauki". -Voprosy istorii, 1992, № 8-9, s. 162.
    7. 

  7. Benedikt R. Khrizantema i mech. Modeli yaponskoj kul'tury. M., 2007.       
    8. 

  8. Morozov N.A. Khristos, v 10 t. M., 1997-2003.
    9. 

  9. Blok M. Apologiya istorii ili remeslo istorika. M., 1986.
    10. 

  10. Taleb N. Chernyj lebed'. Pod znakom nepredskazuemosti. M., 2009.
    11. 

  11. Lieven D. The Sollapse of the Tsarist and Soviet Empires in Somparative Perspective. -The Decline of Empires. Munich, 2001.
    12. 

  12. Lieven D. Empire, History and the Contemporary Global Order. -Proceedings of the British Academy, v. 131. London, 2004.
    13. 

  13. Lieven D. Russia against Napoleon: The Battle for Europe, 1807 to 1814. London, 2009.
    14. 

  14. Lieven D. idem. Leo Tolstoy on War, Russia and Empire. -War and Peace Across the Disciplines. New York, 2010.
    15. 

  15. Lieven D. Russia against Napoleon: the Struggle for Europe. 1807-1814. London, 2010.
    16. 

  16. Rusen J. Historische Vernunft: Grundzuge einer Historik. Die Grundlagen der Geschichtswissenschaft. Gottingen, 1983, s. 119.
    17. 

  17. Koval'chenko I.D. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya, izd. 2. M., 2003, s. 256-257.         
    18. 

  18. Dnevniki imperatora Nikolaya II. M., 1991, s. 265-266.
    19. 

  19. Dnevniki imperatora Nikolaya II. M., 1991, s. 227.
    20. 

  20. Blok M. Ukaz. soch., s. 42.
    21. 

  21. Blok M. Ukaz. soch., s. 43.
    22. 

  22. Erusalimskij A.S. Vopros ob otvetstvennosti za vojnu. -Istorik-marksist, 1932, № 1-2.
    23. 

  23. Tehjlor A. Bor'ba za gospodstvo v Evrope. 1848-1918. M., 1958, s. 31.
    24. 

  24. Kareev N. Istorika (teoriya istoricheskogo znaniya), izd. 2. Pg., 1916, s. 193.
    25. 

  25. Kareev N. Istorika (teoriya istoricheskogo znaniya), izd. 2. Pg., 1916, s. 195.
    26. 

  26. Kareev N. Istoriya Zapadnoj Evropy v novoe vremya. T. 7. Istoriya Zapadnoj Evropy v nachale KhKh stoletiya (1901-1914), ch. 1. Pg., 1916, s. 36-37.
    27. 

  27. Fucks E. Der Weltkrieg in der Karikatur. Erster Band: Bis zum Vorabend des Weltkrieges. Munchen, 1916.
    28. 

  28. Liven D. Rossijskaya imperiya i ee vragi s XVI veka do nashikh dnej. M., 2007, s. 417.           
    29. 

  29. Golikov A.G., Rybachenok I.S. Smekh -delo ser'eznoe. Rossiya i mir na rubezhe XIX-KhKh vekov v politicheskoj karikature. M., 2010.               
    30. 

  30. Brodel' F. Material'naya tsivilizatsiya, ehkonomika, kapitalizm, KhV-KhVIII vv. M., 2006.
    31. 

  31. Kladenius J.M. Allgemeine Geschichtswissenschaft. [Leipzig, 1752]. Wien, 1985.
    32. 

  32. Andreev A.Yu. O "novom prochtenii" istorii rossijskikh universitetov. -Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2009, № 3, s. 149-159.                 
    33. 

  33. Porshnev B.F. O nachale chelovecheskoj istorii. -Filosofskie problemy istoricheskoj nauki. M., 1969, s. 95.
    34. 

  34. Uajt Kh. Metaistoriya. Istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope XIX veka. Ekaterinburg, 2002.
    35. 

  35. Koval'chenko I.D. Ukaz. soch., s. 239.
    36. 

  36. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poehtika. M., 1994.
    37. 

  37. Fuko M. Slova i veschi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. M., 1977.                 
    38. 

  38. Serteau M. Histoiar et Structure. Raris, 1970, p. 173.
    39. 

  39. Fevr L. Boi za istoriyu. M., 1991.
    40.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate