Error _selectel_forbidden_access
Везде
Expert and Layman: Communicative Paradoxes of Expertise and Counter-Expertise
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Expert and Layman: Communicative Paradoxes of Expertise and Counter-Expertise
Annotation
PII
S1811-833X0000616-7-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir Kiselev  Elena V. Bryzgalina
Edition
Volume 57 Issue 2
Pages
33-41
Abstract
The article substantiates the possibility of interpreting expertise as a research communicative practice, in contrast to the expert “comparison with the sample”. Inside the so-called examinations, a counter-examination is institutionally integrated. The communication of expert and counter-expert position, which is a phenomenological personality choice, can take a form of personal institutionalized communication, and can be mediated by mediators and media texts. The results of examination and counter-interaction are determined by many factors, among which the coincidence (mismatch) of the images of the future. Communication between a layman and an expert about science-dimensional situations can be considered in prism of various optics – linguistic, sociological, socio-political, psychological optics, fixing a number of several paradoxes (equality, limited choice, excess / deficit).
Keywords
expertise, counter-expertise, “layman’s knowledge”, communication paradoxes
Date of publication
01.06.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
596
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S1811-833X0000616-7-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 31.10.2020
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Bryzgalina, E.V., Alasaniya, K.Yu., Sadovnichiy, V.A. „Social`no-gumanitarnaya e`kspertiza funkcionirovaniya nacional`ny`x depozitariev biomaterialov” [The Social and Humanitarian Expertise of Functioning of the National Depositaries of Biomaterials], Voprosy filosofii, 2016, no. 2, pp. 8‒21.
    2. 

  2. Tishhenko, P.D. Na granyax zhizni i smerti: filosofskie issledovaniya osnovanij bioetiki [On the Verge of Life and Death: Philosophical Investigations of the Foundations of Bioethics]. Saint Petersburg: Mir, 2011, 331 pp.
    3. 

  3. Harre, R. „Gibridnaya psikhologiya: soyuz diskurs-analiza s neironaukoy” [Hybrid Psycholology: A Tandem of Discourse-Analysis with Neuroscience], Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2005, no. 4, pp. 38‒63. (In Russian)
    4. 

  4. Dementyev, V.V. Nepryamaya kommunikaciya [Indirect Communication]. Moscow: Gnozis, 2006, 376 pp.
    5. 

  5. Sidorenko, L.I. „Metodologicheskoe izmerenie etosa postneklassicheskogo biologicheskogo issledovaniya” [Methodological Dimension of the Ethos of Post-neoclassical Biological Research], Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki – Philosophy of Science and Technology, 2005, no. 1, pp. 280‒289.
    6.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate