- PII
- S1811-833X0000616-7-
- DOI
- 10.7868/SX0000616-7-1
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Abstract
- The article substantiates the possibility of interpreting expertise as a research communicative practice, in contrast to the expert “comparison with the sample”. Inside the so-called examinations, a counter-examination is institutionally integrated. The communication of expert and counter-expert position, which is a phenomenological personality choice, can take a form of personal institutionalized communication, and can be mediated by mediators and media texts. The results of examination and counter-interaction are determined by many factors, among which the coincidence (mismatch) of the images of the future. Communication between a layman and an expert about science-dimensional situations can be considered in prism of various optics – linguistic, sociological, socio-political, psychological optics, fixing a number of several paradoxes (equality, limited choice, excess / deficit).
- Keywords
- expertise, counter-expertise, “layman’s knowledge”, communication paradoxes
- Date of publication
- 01.06.2020
- Year of publication
- 2020
- Number of purchasers
- 22
- Views
- 732
RAS History & PhilologyСлавяноведение Slavianovedenie
- ISSN (Print) 0869-544X
- ISSN (Online) 2949-3927
Expert and Layman: Communicative Paradoxes of Expertise and Counter-Expertise
Индексирование
Scopus
Crossref
Higher Attestation Commission
At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
Scientific Electronic Library