RAS History & PhilologyСлавяноведение Slavianovedenie

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-544X
  • ISSN (Online) 2949-3927

Institutional and informal lobbying practices: the problem of separation and interpretation

PII
S013216250017165-4-
DOI
10.31857/S013216250017165-4
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 10
Pages
50-60
Abstract

The article analyzes possibilities and limitations of institutional (including legislative) regulation of various consolidated representation and lobbying practices in interaction with government structures. Almost any legal institutional lobbying transaction will have its own inconspicuous twin reducing transaction costs in the public communications markets. Informal lobbying practices are used by all interest-based conglomerations, no matter how well established. In reality, laws can regulate only a small part of the behavioral diversity in the lobbying market, regardless of the state of a particular national legislation. The author identifies five reasons why formal and informal lobbying are complementary, and not interchangeable types of activities. The article describes the subjects of informal lobbying (including social networks).

Keywords
lobbying, institutionality, informal social interactions, informal practices, interest groups, regulation, institutional communications
Date of publication
19.10.2021
Year of publication
2021
Number of purchasers
6
Views
251

References

  1. 1. Arutiunian A.S (2016) Lobbying: How to Turn Evil into Good. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 54–60. (In Russ.)
  2. 2. Beketova S.M., Fedyunin I.G. (2018) Legal Regulation of Lobbyism in the Russian Federation. Konstitutsionalizm i gosudarstvovedenie [Constitutionalism and Political Science]. No. 1(11): 19–23. (In Russ.)
  3. 3. Belousov A.B. (2019) The Problem of Revolving Doors in the United States: Between Lobbying and Institutional Corruption. In: Actual Problems of Scientific Support of the State Policy of the Russian Federation in the Field of Combating Corruption. Yekaterinburg: IFP UrO RAN: 564–576. (In Russ.)
  4. 4. Feldman P.Ya. (2014) Lobbying within the System of Social and Political Institutions in the Modern Russia. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [International Relations]. No. 3: 392–397. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.10562. (In Russ.)
  5. 5. Harrison L., Huntington S. (2000) Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress. New York: Basic Books.
  6. 6. Helmke G., Levitsky S. (2007) Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda. Prognozis [Prognosis]. No. 2: 188–211. (In Russ.)
  7. 7. Olson M. (1995) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Moscow: FEI. (In Russ.)
  8. 8. Pavroz A.V. (2016) Lobbying: Institutional Foundations and Practices of Political Influence in Democratic Societies. St. Petersburg: RHGA. (In Russ.)
  9. 9. Rhodes R.A.W. (1986) “Power Dependence”. Theories of Central-Local Relations: A Critical Reassessment. In: Goldsmith M.J. (ed.) New Research in Central-Local Relations. Aldershot: Gower.
  10. 10. Richardson J.J., Jordan G. (1979) Governing under Pressure: The Policy Process in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  11. 11. Van Schendelen R. (2010) More Machiavelli in Brussels: The Art of Lobbying the EU. Место издания: Amsterdam University Press.
  12. 12. Williamson P.J. (1989) Corporatism in Perspective: Аn Introductory Guide to Corporatist Theory. Место издания: Sage Publications.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library